Ko ia kāhore nei i rapu, tē kitea
He who does not seek will not find
ANALYSE
Analysing means carefully examining information in order to understand, interpret and explain it to reach your own conclusions about how the elements of your context/essential question fit together to create something that may not be evident at first glance. This can involve identifying assumptions, gaps and connections between such things as data, reasoning or evidence.
You need to break this down into its fundamental parts.
When you think back over your research what information did you find out that is important to your context? Think about how you can group a range of info into categories. What are the positives / negatives or benefits / challenges. You should have at least 3 areas that are important and this will be the base of your analysis.
Remember - Your analysis is where you turn research into insight. You’re not just reporting what you found, you’re explaining what it means and what it suggests you should do next.
Follow the format below to write your analysis of research.
~ INTRO ~
Include:
your focus/context
your key question
a brief sentence on why this matters (to users, community, or the wider issue)
~ BODY ~
Write three solid paragraphs, one for each area of research:
Paragraph 1 - Part A: User & Human Perspective
Explain what you learned about people and needs.
What patterns did you notice about users’ goals, barriers, and preferences?
Why is this significant for your project?
What assumptions were confirmed or challenged?
What implications does this create for what a “good” outcome would need to do?
Paragraph 2 - Part B: Technical & Practical Perspective
Explain what you learned about feasibility and how outcomes like this work.
What tools/approaches seem most realistic and why?
What constraints or risks matter (time, complexity, access, reliability, safety)?
What conventions/standards should guide your work?
What implications does this have for what you can and should build?
Paragraph 3 - Part C: Wider Implications & Perspectives
Explain what you learned about responsibilities and bigger-picture impacts.
What ethical, legal, cultural, privacy, or sustainability issues apply?
Whose perspectives matter and why?
What risks or harms should be avoided?
What implications does this create for your design decisions?
What to do in every paragraph (simple checklist)
In each paragraph, aim to:
Explain the key findings (don’t list everything)
Interpret what they mean (so what?)
Connect ideas together (how do your sources/perspectives link?)
Implications: state what this suggests you should do/avoid/include
Helpful “analysis moves” you can use:
causes and effects
advantages and disadvantages
strengths and weaknesses
effectiveness / ineffectiveness
tensions or trade-offs (e.g., usability vs privacy, creativity vs clarity)
~ CONCLUSION ~
Wrap up by:
answering your key question at a big-picture level (based on your research)
summarising the 2–3 most important insights from A/B/C
stating what this means for your proposal (e.g., what your project must prioritise)
A strong final line usually sounds like:
“Because of this, my project will need to prioritise…”
“These findings suggest the most important considerations are…”
“This analysis will guide my proposal by…”